Well.. reminds me of Scala implicits. When some people think that implicits hurt the pure essense of good, I found them to be particulary useful, especially in some scenarios that involved passing many "boring" arguments. However, with implicits you could run into troubles, hunting invisible errors of type inference (Scala mark), and i am not sure how useful such technique will be in a lisp. How the compiler decides between, say 3 equally valid candidates? These are the wanderings I came into while I was doing Scala and thinking over the whole matter, but I think that this is an interesting branch of research for computer languages and would like to see and know more of the experiments and try them.
On Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:14:14 AM UTC+4, Mimmo Cosenza wrote: > > It seems interesting to be watched. > > Does anyone already know something about it. > > Mimmo > > http://www.coect.net/metajs/ > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
