On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 12:37:33 UTC+8, Brian Craft wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:14:30 PM UTC-7, Mikera wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, 4 September 2013 10:00:42 UTC+8, Brian Craft wrote:
>>
>>> I'm loading data files of about 1-2G, which are composed of a bunch of 
>>> numeric data blocks. I need to store the data blocks w/o storing 
>>> duplicates. They arrive as vectors of floats, and are stored as primitive 
>>> byte arrays.
>>>
>>> I first tried memoizing the function that saves a block (returning an 
>>> id), with the core memoize function. This failed because every block became 
>>> a different key in the memoization, regardless of the content. It looks 
>>> like clojure treats variables referencing primitive arrays as equal only if 
>>> they refer to the same array. Note:
>>>
>>> cavm.core=> ({[1 2 3] "foo"} [1 2 3])
>>> "foo"
>>> cavm.core=> ({(float-array [1 2 3]) "foo"} (float-array [1 2 3]))
>>> nil
>>> cavm.core=> (let [a (float-array [1 2 3])] ({a "foo"} a))
>>> "foo"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I next tried memoizing over the vector of floats, however performance 
>>> became pathologically slow, and the process threw an OOM. I'm guessing this 
>>> is due to the memory requirements of a clojure vector of floats vs. a 
>>> primitive array of bytes holding the same data. Is there an easy way to 
>>> compare the storage requirements?
>>>
>>> Any suggestions on how better to handle this?
>>>
>>
>> You may want to use the :ndarray-float array implementation in the latest 
>> version of core.matrix.
>>
>> This is effectively a wrapper over a raw Java float array: so your 
>> storage requirement should be close to the size of the raw byte data 
>> (assuming the data blocks are large enough that the size of the wrapper is 
>> negligible)
>>
>
> Ah, interesting.
>
> > *matrix-implementation*
> :vectorz
> > ({(matrix [1 2 3 4]) "foo"} (matrix [1 2 3 4]))
> "foo"
>
> I don't otherwise need core.matrix at this point in the loader, but this 
> is convenient. Why does that work?
>

That works because Vectorz (the underlying Java lib) has a sane 
implementation of .equals and .hashCode. It's pretty fast as well, though 
it is still O(n) since it doesn't do hashcode caching.

Note that the :vectorz implementation uses 8-byte doubles rather than 
4-byte floats though - so if you really need single precision to keep the 
overall memory usage down then it might not be the best choice. I 
personally never use 4-byte floats because the numerical errors soon become 
problematic, but YMMV.

 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to