On 29/08/13 20:23, JvJ wrote:
I wonder if the somewhat counterintuitive concept of a "named
anonymous function" eludes some people, or isn't properly conveyed in
tutorials.
I only consider #(...) as an anonymous function. The longer form (fn []
(...)) has the potential of being perfectly named, it's just you who
doesn't give it a name usually...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
