I don't think it would be possible to reconstruct the original forms in
general, you would need to reverse macroexpansion to provide a form that
has at least a passing familiarity with the original form. Otherwise you
would get fully macroexpanded forms.

That's a lot of work!


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Daniel <doubleagen...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If you can do that, why not return the literal representation of the type
> hinted function?
>
> For the repl you could provide a function that interns the type-hinted
> function into the namespace by evaluating the literal representation first.
>
> From there it's easy to provide something like slamhound.  Once you're
> certain types have been provided to your namespace correctly at the repl,
> run 'lein type <namespace>' to type hint everything in the namespace by
> literally restructuring the file.
>
> Things type hinted with expressions would be tricky, but this could work
> (or you could just leave it alone):
>
> myfn (original)
> myfn-int
> myfn-long
> myfn-float
> etc....
>
>
>
> On Thursday, August 29, 2013 6:40:16 AM UTC-5, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant
> wrote:
>
>> With Clojure the lines blur between compile time and runtime.
>>
>> The clearest way to put it is that type checking is explicitly called at
>> the REPL or in a unit test. Usually this is done during development
>> iterations or testing time.
>>
>> Re: performance improvements: Michael is correct. Interestingly Typed
>> Racket offers numeric optimisations, but leans heavily on Racket's
>> metaprogramming facilities to insert them automatically. There's potential
>> in Typed Clojure for *identification* of speed improvements, but not
>> actually inserting them. Typed Racket's "optimisation coach" comes to mind
>> in ways we can present this information ("put a type hint at line 10, col
>> 20 to get full speed...").
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ambrose
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 6:03 PM, Christian Sperandio <
>> christian...@gmail.com**> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok...
>>>
>>> Another question, the checking is done only once (while compiling) ? Or,
>>> it's done while the runtime?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/8/29 Michael Klishin <michael....@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> 2013/8/29 Christian Sperandio <christian...@gmail.com**>
>>>>
>>>> Is there any perf improvement to use static typing in Clojure?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  core.typed is not a compiler, it's a type annotation/checker
>>>> implemented
>>>> as a library.
>>>>
>>>> If you are familiar with Erlang, it is to Clojure what Dialyzer is to
>>>> Erlang.
>>>> --
>>>> MK
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/**michaelklishin <http://github.com/michaelklishin>
>>>> http://twitter.com/**michaelklishin <http://twitter.com/michaelklishin>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>>> your first post.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>>
>>>> For more options, visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com.
>>>
>>> For more options, visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to