Warren Lynn <wrn.l...@gmail.com> writes: >> Still miss the Elisp debugger, which is great. It's right there, in your >> editing environment. It's good for debugging my own code. It's really >> good for working out someone elses code. I wish I debug clojure in the >> same way. It's not essential, of course. But nice. >> >> Phil >> > > I miss the Elisp debugger or Common Lisp debugger too. They made fixing an > issue so much easier. I think good REPL is a complement (and a very > important/good one) to it, not a replacement to it. I don't know if I > gained much (or any) if I got a good tool but lost another good one.
Yeah, this is exactly what I feel. The elisp debugger is joy because it's right there, in your editing environment and is very first class; although if you are debugging the command loop this is a problem, but in general it's fantastic. I like the test environment in clojure, and although they exist in elisp I never really use them; don't know why, just habit I guess. And yes, in it's absence, I do lean on other tools instead. Still, it would be nice. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
