I think it looks interesting because it seems like maintaining the Clojure
semantics is what also gives a lot of the cljs<->js interop problems. It
seems like there would be room for a variant of ClojureScript which
maintains as much of the semantics as possible without compromising
performance or interop too much. I haven't actually played with
ClojureScript much - to what extent do people think this is possible?


On 25 May 2013 21:40, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's another interesting Lisp variant to JavaScript compiler but besides a
> surface like similarity, it doesn't really preserve many of Clojure's
> semantics (keyword behavior, data structures, immutability, notion of
> truth, protocols, multimethods, etc).
>
> David
>
>
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Rich Morin <r...@cfcl.com> wrote:
>
>> I saw  mention of Wisp the other day (on Hacker News, IIRC), but I
>> haven't noticed any discussion of it on the Clojure email list,
>> (def newsletter), etc:
>>
>>   Wisp is a homoiconic JavaScript dialect with clojure syntax,
>>   s-expressions and macros.  Unlike clojurescript, Wisp code
>>   compiles to human-readable JavaScript.  The goal of Wisp is
>>   to compile to the JavaScript you would have written anyway.
>>   Think of Wisp asmarkdown for JS programing!
>>
>>   Homoiconic syntax and macros are the primary motivations!
>>
>>   -- https://github.com/Gozala/wisp
>>
>>   See also   http://jeditoolkit.com/try-wisp/
>>
>> Has anyone here played with Wisp?  Any reactions?
>>
>> -r
>>
>>  --
>> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm            Rich Morin
>> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume     r...@cfcl.com
>> http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog     +1 650-873-7841
>>
>> Software system design, development, and documentation
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to