Hi, Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013 16:16:36 UTC+2 schrieb Mark: > > That's a fair point, but do you always know that what you've gotten back > is a sequence or a data structure, if you aren't looking directly at the > code that you're calling? >
Most of my code are either sequence-y things (mostly transformations). Then I call seq on the argument and work with the result together with a when-let. (maybe transforming things back into the original type of thing afterwards) Or it's about data structures. Then - most of the time - you have to know anyway what you are working on, because the data structures have different usage scenarios. Typical case: (into (empty x) (map some-fn (take some-number (filter some-pred x)))) That said: my code is usually not representative. Meikel -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
