Hi, Am Samstag, 11. Mai 2013 21:25:11 UTC+2 schrieb Alex Baranosky: > > Most of the code I see and write at work at Runa uses (not (empty? foo)). > I'll continue to defend the position that it is more obvious code, and > therefore better (imo :) ) > > seq belongs to seq-land. empty? belongs to data structure land. It should actually be implemented as #(zero? (count %)). But unfortunately it is not. Maybe I'm to green (and too much a premature optimiser) , but I don't like allocating and initialising a new object just to throw it away immediately.
Meikel -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
