Thanks - I'll give that a try. On Thursday, April 11, 2013 11:18:06 AM UTC-7, Alan Malloy wrote: > > 0.6.2 is six months old. I don't think anything about this has changed > since then, but you should at least try [org.flatland/protobuf "0.7.2"] and > see if that does what you expect. > > On Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:39:12 AM UTC-7, David Pidcock wrote: >> >> >> I have some Java classes generated elsewhere (not by the lein proto >> plugin) and I'm wanting to use them as the basis for the [protobuf >> "0.6.2"] code interactions (for interdependency with an existing java >> project) >> >> One thing I noticed about the output in REPL is that only the first key >> is presented to the screen from protobuf.core.PersistentProtocolBufferMap >> >> Even (keys my-proto) only shows the first key >> >> At first I thought I'd screwed something up, but when I try >> (:some-key my-proto) >> I get the expected result. >> >> The data referenced by :some-key in this instance is another map -- >> almost all of the data contained in the message is complex like this. >> >> Is this a bug in protobuf.core.PersistentProtocolBufferMap? Or am I >> missing something? >> >> >>
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
