2013/3/29 Ryan Neufeld <r...@thinkrelevance.com> > This means Github for issues and pull-requests, easy-to-submit CAs, etc. > Hopefully once we've proven out these more modern workflows we can start to > backport them into the Clojure process. > > I have to ask you this: is there anything we've missed, or do you have any > suggestions you'd like implemented in the Pedestal project? >
Ryan, This is very good news. One thing I'd like to see is a way for the community to contribute to pedestal.io (the site) using the same process. Thanks to everyone involved in these process improvements for Pedestal. I have doubts that Clojure will ever be developed the same way but it's great to see Pedestal not following the route of Clojure Contrib. -- MK http://github.com/michaelklishin http://twitter.com/michaelklishin -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
