Hey, sorry for the delay in answering your question Michael. We will definitely be accepting pull requests. In fact, we've already accepted a few minor pulls from community members.
I know you've been an outspoken critic of the Clojure contribution process - we understand that pain, and want to do things differently with Pedestal. This means Github for issues and pull-requests, easy-to-submit CAs, etc. Hopefully once we've proven out these more modern workflows we can start to backport them into the Clojure process. I have to ask you this: is there anything we've missed, or do you have any suggestions you'd like implemented in the Pedestal project? - Ryan @ Relevance On Sunday, March 24, 2013 12:30:10 AM UTC-4, Michael Klishin wrote: > > > 2013/3/24 Sean Corfield <seanco...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > >> Contributor Agreements were available for signing at Clojure/West so >> I'm guessing it will be under the same process as Clojure itself... >> > > They have electronic CA: > http://pedestal.io/#contribute > > My question is about pull requests, not the CA. > -- > MK > > http://github.com/michaelklishin > http://twitter.com/michaelklishin > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
