On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 10:37 -0700, Balint Erdi wrote: > (let [neighbors (persistent! > (reduce > (fn [c u] (if (explored u) c (conj! c u))) > (transient []) > (G v)))]
What happens if you do ^^^ *after* vvv? > (explored v) (recur vs explored lhalf rhalf (inc iter-cnt)) -- Stephen Compall "^aCollection allSatisfy: [:each | aCondition]": less is better than -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
