On Monday, March 25, 2013 4:19:12 AM UTC-5, Ustun Ozgur wrote: > > To compare, PyCon videos are usually up in less than 1 week, see > http://pyvideo.org/. Probably the production of those videos are > supported by the PSF, but it might still be a good idea to see how they do > it. I made some googling as to how they do it. Here is an interview with > Carl Karsten, who owns the aptly named "NextDayVideo": > http://us.pycon.org/2011/blog/2011/03/02/pycon-2011-interview-carl-karsten/"After > > a half-hour setup, all of the talks, then a half-hour teardown, it’s an > encoding and checking party after that." > > From the company's website, it seems that the rate per day is around > $4000, but they seem flexible: > http://www.nextdayvideo.com/page/pricing.html >
My total costs with InfoQ are less than $1000. At $4000/day, the conference would be losing money. > The main difference with these videos with the ones on infoq is that there > is only the video stream, there is no separate slide view. This makes it > easier to produce since one doesn't need to sync the video with the slides. > (which, by the way, is better for me personally, because watching InfoQ > videos on iPad is always awkward since one only sees only the speaker.) > That should be changing soon. > One other alternative I can think of is to urge the speakers to record the > talk themselves using QuickTime (or equivalent in other OSes). This is > actually trivial, see > http://zachholman.com/posts/how-to-screencast-your-talk/ for an example. If > doing this at the time of the talk adds to the pressure of giving the talk, > we could perhaps encourage the speakers to do it while rehearsing. > This would be a nightmare. I have a hard time just getting speakers to send me their slides! > Alex Miller, how would this affect the InfoQ deal in terms of > copyright?This might indeed be the best of both worlds, the professional > quality videos will be still shown on infoq, while the screencast versions > will be immediately available. For live-coding sessions, which is not that > uncommon, actually the screencast quality would be higher. > InfoQ's main consideration is that they want the first free release of a talk to be on their site, so this would not be ok. > > > Ustun > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
