For me ->> is a bread and butter of working with collections, like here:
(->> some-collection
(concat other-collection)
distinct
(filter some-predicate)
(sort-by some-sort-fn)
(take 10))
On Monday, March 11, 2013 11:58:29 AM UTC+1, edw...@kenworthy.info wrote:
>
> So I understand that:
>
> (-> foo bar wibble)
>
> is equivalent to
>
> (wibble (bar (foo)))
>
> With the advantage that the latter version is better, in the sense that
> it's clearer what the final result is (the result of the call to wobble).
>
> What I don't understand is the need for -> the only thing it seems to do
> is make something Lispy appear to be imperative.
>
> Is that it?
>
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
