On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Marko Topolnik <marko.topol...@gmail.com> wrote: > In Clojure 1.5 I would write
Yes, well, we'll be on 1.5.1 soon. Since this is heavily used production code, we've been waiting for a gold release and for the memory leak to get fixed before moving to 1.5.x :) > (as-> response x (:body x) (:postalCodes x) (map to-location x) (sort-by > :city x)) I like the new threading operators and I'm looking forward to using them but I'm not sure this is better since you need some neutral identifier that, in this expression, represents a map, a map, an array and a sequence so the choice is either picking a good name for all of those or something generic (most likely a punctuation symbol)... Definitely YMMV. I think cond-> / some-> will be more useful to us than as-> but we'll see how it goes once we move up to 1.5.x. -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
