On 11/03/13 15:08, Dave Kincaid wrote:
I'm with you. I don't like it personally. Every time I come across it
reading code I have to stop and think about what exactly it does.
I didn't use to like it either but after coding rubik's cube I've come
to appreciate it more...imagine this:
(-> cube
(rotate-left)
(rotate-up)
...
...
...
...
...
)
In other words when you have serious nesting of similar actions, then it
does read a lot cleaner...now, having said that, you will find in
several Clojure books the same thing without any serious nesting (e.g:
(-> m :some-key (+ 1))). I guess for such occasions it is purely a mater
of taste...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
