So I understand that: (-> foo bar wibble)
is equivalent to (wibble (bar (foo))) With the advantage that the latter version is better, in the sense that it's clearer what the final result is (the result of the call to wobble). What I don't understand is the need for -> the only thing it seems to do is make something Lispy appear to be imperative. Is that it? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
