[reviving a slightly old thread]
Note that as of clojure 1.4 you can also do:
  (:require foo.bar :refer :all)
in fact from comments I've seen elsewhere there is a general intention to
remove :use entirely?

It'd be good to have some clarity on this.  The vast majority of code
samples use :use, some with :only.  The docstring for ns doesn't even
mention :refer! The clojure cheatsheet points to
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/ns which _does_ have the
new syntax, in the last couple of examples; and it links to the tutorial at
http://blog.8thlight.com/colin-jones/2010/12/05/clojure-libs-and-namespaces-require-use-import-and-ns.htmlwhich
uses 'use' throughout, except for an easily missable update half way
through that says to use :refer.

So, to what extent are people actually deprecating :use ?  I'm introducing
a new team to clojure and trying to suggest that :refer is the way to go,
but it's tricky when every code sample out there uses :use.

Especially for the situation where you actually want to import a whole
namespace - should we be using:
    (:use midje.sweet)
or:
    (:require midje.sweet :refer :all)
?

- Korny


On 15 February 2013 00:26, Jim foo.bar <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  I know that using a bare :use in the ns macro is generally frowned upon
> as it provides no hints about what is actually being used...
>
> However, I 've got 2 namespaces 'abstractions.clj' and
> 'concretions.clj'...concretions.clj will eventually use all the protocols
> defined in abstractions.clj...at the moment it doesn't but as I work
> through it I want to provide concrete records for *all* the protocols...
>
> Should I just go and :use the entire thing or should I stick with :require
> and keep typing 'pro/XXX' a million times? That specific namespace is very
> central to my work...
>
> Jim
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Kornelis Sietsma  korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
"We do not quit playing because we grow old, we grow old because we quit
playing" - O.W. Holmes

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to