It's a known issue. I guess it could be avoided if some kind of trampolining scheme was introduced instead of the current recursive one in LazySeq.java.
On Saturday, March 2, 2013 8:38:24 PM UTC+1, Ben wrote: > > Try it and see: > > (reduce (fn [acc _] (concat acc acc)) '() (range 1750)) > > blows up with a stack overflow error. Changing the inner expression to > (doall (concat acc acc)) avoids the issue, but (obviously) also > requires giving up laziness. > > This is admittedly fairly insanely nested, but I would have expected it to > work. > > -- > Ben Wolfson > "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, > which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family > and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks > for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry] > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
