I've got a github repo with submissions for the Benchmarks Game web site for 
Java and Clojure, with several different Clojure programs for most problems:

    https://github.com/jafingerhut/clojure-benchmarks

If people would like to submit what they consider idiomatic Clojure programs 
for any of these problems, feel free to send them to me, and I can include 
them, not only in the repo but also in some benchmark results that I am 
planning to publish at the link below some day when I have them ready, under 
"whole program benchmarks":

    
http://jafingerhut.github.com/clojure-benchmarks-results/Clojure-benchmarks.html

If you do submit a program, I'd ask you to consider submitting a version that 
you wrote first and got working correctly, before even looking at any kinds of 
optimizations at all, as well as one you consider to be a mild optimization 
pass over that first version, and yet still "idiomatic".

Andy

On Feb 26, 2013, at 12:50 PM, Marko Topolnik wrote:

> I see; didn't notice that one. Again, only the fastest entries are shown. It 
> appears that the same is the case with Marceau's graphs; he just didn't state 
> that explicitly.
> 
> Things don't look very rosy for Clojure: it turns out to be about as verbose 
> as Java and significantly slower (this confirms my experience; slightly 
> slower than regular Java code, significantly slower than highly optimized 
> Java). If idiomatic Clojure was used, it would move it to the left and 
> upwards; Clojure would hang out with JRuby.
> 
> Anyway, it would be really great to see such a comparison chart, but only 
> with idiomatic code involved. This way I don't have a clue what to make of 
> Haskell, for example.
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 6:30:55 PM UTC+1, Ben Mabey wrote:
> As Issac pointed out, here are some very recent graphs (including Clojure):
> 
> http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/code-used-time-used-shapes.php
> 
> On 2/26/13 2:35 AM, Marko Topolnik wrote:
>> This is a great analysis, thanks for the link; shame it's so old.
>> 
>> On Sunday, February 24, 2013 10:45:33 PM UTC+1, Ben Mabey wrote:
>> 
>> Yeah, I wish the Benchmarks allowed for idiomatic submissions and finely 
>> tuned submissions.  That would allow you to get some sort of an idea how 
>> performant the dominant idiom is.  Along those lines this older post did an 
>> interesting analysis on the benchmark solutions where it explored the 
>> tension that exists between expressiveness and performance across the 
>> various languages:
>> 
>> http://blog.gmarceau.qc.ca/2009/05/speed-size-and-dependability-of.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
>> first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>  
>  

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to