as-> is meant to be used as the only threading form. In your example you'd 
want to replace the initial ->> with as->.

On Monday, February 18, 2013 9:04:55 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
>
> That extra parenses trick is neat, never thought of that!
>
> As for as->> being redundant - it could be considered so indeed, given 
> that as-> can be lambified: (->> [] (#(as-> % x (map inc x)))) - but 
> that's pretty damn ugly haha. If you were thinking something else, please 
> let me know.
>
> Thanks - Victor
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Marko Topolnik 
> <marko.t...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 18, 2013 5:40:51 PM UTC+1, vemv wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> And neither can be solved by adding a lambda:
>>>
>>> (-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) #(map inc %)) ;; fail
>>>
>>
>> Lambda does solve it, you are just missing the parens around the lambda:
>>
>> (-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) (#(map inc %)))
>>  
>>
>>
>>> Clojure 1.5's as->, though, can come to the rescue.
>>>
>>> (-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) (as-> x (map inc x))) ;; cool
>>>
>>> Now, I only wish 1.5 came with as->> macro! Its implemetation is 
>>> trivial anyway.
>>>
>>> (->> [1 2 3] (as->> _ (nth _ 0)))
>>>
>>> Of course, for the given examples, using these "as" forms is overkill. 
>>> But if you've ever ended up writing large expressions (especially when 
>>> experimenting) which arbitrarily nest/interleave ->> and ->, using as-> and 
>>> as->> can provide a more sequential, structured alternative.
>>>
>>> Couldn't find any related discussion about the uses of as->, as its name 
>>> is unfriendly to Google/JIRA searches. Thoughts?
>>>
>>
>> as-> is actually a generalization of both -> and ->>: you get to choose 
>> where to involve the previous result in each form. That is why as->> would 
>> be redundant.
>>
>> -Marko
>>
>>  -- 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>  
>>  
>>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to