While there are other possible uses 
(example<https://twitter.com/borkdude/status/302881431649128448>), 
I see myself mainly using as-> as a mechanism for resorting to thread-last 
within a thread-first expression.

For example, given

(-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0))

I might want to add an operation that doesn't happen to have an adequate 
signature (sequence functions tend to not be thread-first friendly). You 
can't just add:

(-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) (map inc)) ;; fail

And neither can be solved by adding a lambda:

(-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) #(map inc %)) ;; fail

Clojure 1.5's as->, though, can come to the rescue.

(-> [[1 1 1] 2 3] (nth 0) (as-> x (map inc x))) ;; cool

Now, I only wish 1.5 came with as->> macro! Its implemetation is trivial 
anyway.

(defmacro as->> [name & body]
  (let [[b v] ((juxt butlast last) body)]
    `(let [~name ~v]
       ~@b)))

(->> [1 2 3] (as->> _ (nth _ 0)))

Of course, for the given examples, using these "as" forms is overkill. But 
if you've ever ended up writing large expressions (especially when 
experimenting) which arbitrarily nest/interleave ->> and ->, using as-> and 
as->> can provide a more sequential, structured alternative.

Couldn't find any related discussion about the uses of as->, as its name is 
unfriendly to Google/JIRA searches. Thoughts?

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to