On Jan 29, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Rich Morin wrote: > > This begs the question: what would be the lowest amount of friction that > we should try for? One answer, it seems to me, is that there should be > an easy way to add features _using Clojure_. I realize that this would > not be a general solution, but it might make a lot of Clojurists smile. > > I realize that Emacs Lisp is "pretty close to Clojure". However, if we > wanted to be programming in some other form of Lisp, we'd be doing that. > So, if any editor mavens out there want my vote, here's a way to get it.
I know I probably bring this up too often... but once upon a time there was a Common Lisp programming environment with an editor called FRED (= FRED Resembles Emacs Deliberately) that had: 1) the power of emacs, 2) the ease of use of a modern, platform native text editing application, and 3) self-programability in Common Lisp. It was really nice. IMHO it would be heavenly if we could have something like this for Clojure. From what I can tell the people in this community have ample skills to make this happen if they share the vision and have the time, etc. -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
