On Friday, January 4, 2013 8:35:45 PM UTC+1, puzzler wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Edward Tsech <edt...@gmail.com<javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Thanks Dave! Seems like different people expect slightly different >> behavior. > > > +1, I agree with points both on threading macros and on redundant indentation due to if-let-if combinations.
> This wouldn't be such a limitation if you could use anonymous functions > among the chained functions (since then you could set up a function with > the "hole" anywhere you want), but this doesn't work. > I do this regurarly: (-> x (fun1 arg1) (#(fun2 arg2 %)) ...) It works, but I still don't like it, I find that extra hash and parens distasteful. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
