Wouldn't it be more accurately named "if-and-let" if it supported that? E.g. (if (and x y z) ...).
On Thursday, January 3, 2013 10:24:57 PM UTC-8, Edward Tsech wrote: > > Hey guys, > > if-let and when-let macros support only 2 forms in binding vector: > > (if-let [x 1 y 2] > ...) > java.lang.IllegalArgumentExcepdtion: if-let requires exactly 2 forms in > binding vector(NO_SOURCE_FILE:1) > > Why doesn't "if-let" support any even amount of binding forms as "let" > does? > > e.g. > (if-let [x 1 y 2 z 3] > (+ x y z) > 0) ; => 6 > > (if-let [x 1 y nil z 3] > (+ x y z) > 0) ; => 0 > > Thanks! > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
