On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Michael Drogalis <madrush...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Saturday, December 29, 2012 9:57:56 AM UTC-5, Adam Clements wrote: >> One thing that worries me though. While this is fine for examples where >> you simply log the exception and move on, what if you need to do something >> more complicated with the actual data? Say for example you need to >> queue/trigger a retry, you no longer have your local bindings to work with >> so you'd have to go back to a normal try/catch (disclaimer - didn't read the >> paper, just going off the code and your comments) > > > I agree. There's certainly cases where the handler will want to restart the > task and need access to the original bindings. I'll tinker around with a > clean way to do this. Open for suggestions.
Isn't this what Common Lisp's condition system allowed? (And wasn't there a condition-like library for Clojure?) -- Ben Wolfson "Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure." [Larousse, "Drink" entry] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
