Would it make sense for the handler to have access to the exception 'e' ? On 29/12/2012, at 6:14 AM, Michael Drogalis <madrush...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey folks, > > After watching The Language of the System and being directed to Joe > Armstrong's paper on error handling, I concurred that his approach is > fantastic. I really wanted the same thing for more rudimentary operations, > like file handling. So I wrote Dire https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/dire > > The pros are of this are that error handling code is removed from application > logic and it is not order complected. > The cons are that tasks are not as strongly isolated as they are in Erlang. > Also, because it is so simple (16 lines), > there's no way for a supervisor to "restart" a child task. (Yet, I guess. > Ideas?) > > Can such a thing be useful in a non-distributed environment? Or does this > look like a hassle to use? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
