Would it make sense for the handler to have access to the exception 'e' ?

On 29/12/2012, at 6:14 AM, Michael Drogalis <madrush...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey folks,
> 
> After watching The Language of the System and being directed to Joe 
> Armstrong's paper on error handling, I concurred that his approach is 
> fantastic. I really wanted the same thing for more rudimentary operations, 
> like file handling. So I wrote Dire https://github.com/MichaelDrogalis/dire
> 
> The pros are of this are that error handling code is removed from application 
> logic and it is not order complected.
> The cons are that tasks are not as strongly isolated as they are in Erlang. 
> Also, because it is so simple (16 lines),
> there's no way for a supervisor to "restart" a child task. (Yet, I guess. 
> Ideas?)
> 
> Can such a thing be useful in a non-distributed environment? Or does this 
> look like a hassle to use?
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to