Just curious why something like the following wouldn't be part of subvector?

public Object kvreduce(IFn f, Object init){
    for(int i=0;i<(end - start);i++){
        init = f.invoke(init,i,v.nth(start+i));

    return init;

}



On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Andy Fingerhut
<andy.finger...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I am not saying that one would *have* to give up O(1) subvec in order to
> support other operations.
>
> I am guessing, without having done a thorough analysis, that an O(log n)
> subvec based on RRB Trees would make most/all operations on subvec's just
> fall out fairly naturally, rather than having to be written as special
> cases.
>
> Andy
>
> On Dec 27, 2012, at 8:54 PM, Alan Busby wrote:
>
> I'm confused why we'd need to give up O(1) just to support something like
> reduce-kv on subvectors.
> Isn't the implementation of subvector just a wrapper around the original
> vector along with a start and end value?
>
> Current source here;
>
> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/APersistentVector.java
>
> I apologize if I'm missing something key here.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andy Fingerhut 
> <andy.finger...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1082
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to