I'm confused why we'd need to give up O(1) just to support something like reduce-kv on subvectors. Isn't the implementation of subvector just a wrapper around the original vector along with a start and end value?
Current source here; https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/APersistentVector.java I apologize if I'm missing something key here. On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 3:18 AM, Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com>wrote: > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1082 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
