Actually, scratch that first one. Looks like Stuart did finally apply the patch. Other reasons for bultitude's existence still apply.
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 6:06:40 AM UTC-6, Anthony Grimes wrote: > > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/TNS-1 is the reason why I did > bultitude. It was an important bug that was never addressed, and probably > still hasn't been addressed. Other people have also added relatively > complex classpath features to it as well, and since it isn't a contrib > project you can contribute to it without having to sign a CA and do the > Jira patch parade. Because of these things and especially because of the > latter I'll definitely continue maintaining bultitude. I'm interested in > the new features added to tools.namespace, and will definitely look into > them and maybe take whatever makes sense over to bultitude. > > On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:02:55 AM UTC-6, Mikera wrote: >> >> Hi Stuart, >> >> Re: tools.namespace, I've found some similar functions in the bultitude >> library (https://github.com/Raynes/bultitude/tree/master/src/bultitude). >> Apparently it addresses >> "specific needs that clojure.tools.namespace did not provide". >> >> Is one of these recommended over the other, or is there a plan to merge >> these so that >> we get the best of both? >> >> On Friday, 14 December 2012 21:52:40 UTC+8, Stuart Sierra wrote: >>> >>> >>> Changelog & more info: >>> >>> https://github.com/clojure/tools.namespace >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
