The limitation was only on ->> but I think that is due for a fix in
the next version.


On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:48 PM, JvJ <kfjwhee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Clever, but I always thought -> had to take more than one parameter.  Maybe
> that's only for ->>
>
>
> On Thursday, 13 December 2012 13:35:33 UTC-5, Gary Verhaegen wrote:
>>
>> I've found this gem in The Joy of Clojure :
>>
>> #(-> [%])
>>
>> which would work similarly for any literal, I guess : #(-> {:a %}) in
>> this case. Much nicer than identity, IMHO.
>>
>> On 4 June 2012 15:28, Steven Obua <ste...@obua.de> wrote:
>> > Jay's example has convinced me that redefinition is not a good idea
>> > anyway,
>> > because #(f) is not always equivalent to f when (count [f]) is 1.
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups "Clojure" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> > your
>> > first post.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
>> > For more options, visit this group at
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en



-- 
-- http://blog.fogus.me
-- http://github.com/fogus
--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to