Clever, but I always thought -> had to take more than one parameter. Maybe
that's only for ->>
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 13:35:33 UTC-5, Gary Verhaegen wrote:
>
> I've found this gem in The Joy of Clojure :
>
> #(-> [%])
>
> which would work similarly for any literal, I guess : #(-> {:a %}) in
> this case. Much nicer than identity, IMHO.
>
> On 4 June 2012 15:28, Steven Obua <ste...@obua.de <javascript:>> wrote:
> > Jay's example has convinced me that redefinition is not a good idea
> anyway,
> > because #(f) is not always equivalent to f when (count [f]) is 1.
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Clojure" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your
> > first post.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
