Most of what could be accomplished by an internal define could be done with a let statement. But if you don't want to add the brackets, you can create your own function definition macro that converts defs to lets.
On Thursday, 18 October 2012 17:12:04 UTC-4, Grant Rettke wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, David Nolen > <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke <gre...@acm.org<javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Anyone voted for internal define lately? > > At this point I think it's highly unlikely to change - the behavior is > > pretty well documented: > > I see. Just a thought that an internal define not necessarily 'def' > might be a nice idea for a lot of these cases, but then again hey it > is lisp we can tweak it to our liking. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
