On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Ben Wolfson <wolf...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: >> It isn't side effecting it is sequencing. > > Clojure's let is already sequential, like Scheme's let*: "The bindings > are sequential, so each binding can see the prior bindings." R5RS > Scheme explicitly states that its let makes no guarantees about > sequences.
Understood but you don't write entire function definitions inside of a let block :). Then again I guess I misunderstood the use case, which is to just print debug information once in a while. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
