On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Herwig Hochleitner
<hhochleit...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> The emitter still can not look ahead in its single pass, but thinking
> about it, it seems to me your proposal could be implemented by lazily
> initializing global-hierachy in derive.
>

Sounds good!


>
>
>> Please also note: I'm not proposing to get rid of the single pass
>>> semantics of clojure. Quite the opposite. After the analyzer is done with
>>> its single pass and has unambigously resolved everything, optimization
>>> passes are free to optimize, since the semantics are already established.
>>>
>>
>> Nothing I've said has anything do w/ optimization passes. Just how
>> immediate problems could be solved without waiting for that ;)
>>
>
> Ack, I think I'll try the two simple fixes first ;)
>
> ;)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to