On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Herwig Hochleitner <hhochleit...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > The emitter still can not look ahead in its single pass, but thinking > about it, it seems to me your proposal could be implemented by lazily > initializing global-hierachy in derive. > Sounds good! > > >> Please also note: I'm not proposing to get rid of the single pass >>> semantics of clojure. Quite the opposite. After the analyzer is done with >>> its single pass and has unambigously resolved everything, optimization >>> passes are free to optimize, since the semantics are already established. >>> >> >> Nothing I've said has anything do w/ optimization passes. Just how >> immediate problems could be solved without waiting for that ;) >> > > Ack, I think I'll try the two simple fixes first ;) > > ;) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
