On Sunday, October 7, 2012 10:16:58 AM UTC-7, Grant Rettke wrote: > > Hi, > > May you please share your experience or preferences for rules engines > written in or used from Clojure? > > My goal is to: > > 1. Allow rule definitions separate from the code (though I view rule > definitions as programming to be performed by the programmer). > 2. Allow rules to be defined in modules. > 3. Provide debugging features such that I may sit with a business > user, and start with a particular scenario of data, and walk them > through how the rules transform the data. The goal is to be able to > answer questions from the business eg "I didn't expect this result, > why is it this way?. > 4. Debugging. > 5. Nice editing. > 6. Find something nice for 3-9 month projects with 2-4 developers; in > other words not looking for an enterprise system with licensing priced > accordingly. > 7. Any technology is an option because we can probably use it with > some form of interop. > 8. Find something that people use for real work for a long time. > 9. Find something that costs not more than a thousand USD. > 10. Find something that changes how you think, has materials to help > change that, and gets you down the path of thinking about how to write > system with rules engines rather than shoe-horn them into a corner. > > Best wishes, > > Grant > > -- > ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) > http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ > ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
