Probably they wouldn't, but that's not the point. The clojure community is doing something wrong for providing a coherent beginner experience. Maybe we aren't good at encouraging people to contribute documentation. Or the composability of Clojure leads to small "library islands" without much community. Don't really know, but something is clearly wrong when so many complains about it.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Grant Rettke <gret...@acm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 4:13 PM, aboy021 <arthur.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The getting started issue is an ongoing problem for Clojure. It's an > issue > > that keeps coming up in the surveys and on the mailing list. Other > languages > > are doing it really well, Scala is just a convenient example. What does > the > > Clojure community need to do to help support the creation of something > that > > is on par? > > Surely they wouldn't mind you contributing to the website. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
