>From your description of how proxy would work, yes. On Sunday, September 16, 2012 6:48:44 PM UTC-4, Brandon Bloom wrote: > > Would it be correct to interpret this as another vote for JVM Clojure's > proxy macro? > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:16:37 PM UTC-7, Alexander Hudek wrote: >> >> I've used it in conjunction with goog/base due to a problem with >> simple/advanced compilation. I'm not sure if things have changed since I >> encountered this problem, or if there is something else I'm doing wrong. >> See the code and comment below. The deactivated "this-as" code only worked >> with whitespace compilation. >> >> (goog-extend >> NoEnterHandler goog.editor.Plugin >> ([] >> ; simple and advanced compilation require a literal 'this' in goog.base >> ; js* is supposed to be a compiler detail. >> #_(this-as this (goog/base this)) >> (goog/base (js* "this"))) >> >> (getTrogClassId [] "NoEnterHandler") >> >> (isSupportedCommand [c] false) >> >> (handleKeyDown >> [e] >> (if (= (.-keyCode e) key-codes/ENTER) (.preventDefault e)))) >> >> The goog.extend macro is copied from >> >> https://github.com/netguy204/MOVE/blob/master/src/move/macros.clj >> >> On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:12:21 PM UTC-4, Brandon Bloom wrote: >>> >>> I'm exploring some changes to the ClojureScript compiler backend and am >>> curious if anyone is using one particular implementation detail: The js* >>> special form. >>> >>> Note that I'm not asking about the js/ pseudo-namespace, only the js* >>> special form. >>> >>> Are you using it in your ClojureScript projects? If so, what for? >>> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
