Would it be correct to interpret this as another vote for JVM Clojure's proxy macro?
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:16:37 PM UTC-7, Alexander Hudek wrote: > > I've used it in conjunction with goog/base due to a problem with > simple/advanced compilation. I'm not sure if things have changed since I > encountered this problem, or if there is something else I'm doing wrong. > See the code and comment below. The deactivated "this-as" code only worked > with whitespace compilation. > > (goog-extend > NoEnterHandler goog.editor.Plugin > ([] > ; simple and advanced compilation require a literal 'this' in goog.base > ; js* is supposed to be a compiler detail. > #_(this-as this (goog/base this)) > (goog/base (js* "this"))) > > (getTrogClassId [] "NoEnterHandler") > > (isSupportedCommand [c] false) > > (handleKeyDown > [e] > (if (= (.-keyCode e) key-codes/ENTER) (.preventDefault e)))) > > The goog.extend macro is copied from > > https://github.com/netguy204/MOVE/blob/master/src/move/macros.clj > > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:12:21 PM UTC-4, Brandon Bloom wrote: >> >> I'm exploring some changes to the ClojureScript compiler backend and am >> curious if anyone is using one particular implementation detail: The js* >> special form. >> >> Note that I'm not asking about the js/ pseudo-namespace, only the js* >> special form. >> >> Are you using it in your ClojureScript projects? If so, what for? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
