Hi,

in my understanding, RESTful system design (as described in Roy Fielding's
dissertation) does not advocate hiding any state "behind a bunch of
methods". :)

In REST, application state is carried by the representation that is passed
back and forth between the server and the client.

It seems to me that a "truly" RESTful system design is very much in line of
what Rich was talking about.

Las

2012/8/15 Conrad <drc...@gmail.com>

> Hi Everyone... Quick question about Rich's latest talk:
>
> In it he eloquently argues that "you don't want to systems to communicate
> with each other by calling each other's methods. Instead it is better to
> just move values between systems that can also be queued."
>
> It occurs to me that RESTful web interfaces essentially hide a big chunk
> of state behind a bunch of methods (i.e. the URIs you can GET/PUT/POST to.)
>
> Am I right in thinking that Rich's talk is an argument AGAINST RESTful
> design? It seems to me his talk would suggest the best interface would
> almost be a SOAPy interface, where all communication is to a single URL.
> (Of course unlike SOAP the calls wouldn't consist of method invocations but
> instead consist of a stream of values.)
>
> Is this right?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en




-- 
László Török

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to