On 19/06/12 19:06, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
No no I tried that...the map has to be one of the first things in the namespace. 2 of its keys call a specific fn that itself expects the map as argument. everything I tried will either return 'stack overflow' (if I try to def/declare) or a 'attempting to call unbound fn' (If i defn/declare)...the only way is to have defn in both places...
I apologise for this last statement...it is simply not true...the way I described it, it should alway fall into an infinite recursion causing a stack overflow....the fns that are called from within the map DO NOT expect that same map as argument! which ultimately means I can just def the map....sorry for any confusion...I'll be more careful!
Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
