Is there a catch to this that I'm not seeing? It seems to work just
fine...after all the fn always returns the same thing (which always has
the same values in)...
Jim
On 19/06/12 12:57, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
This is really impressive!!! From 61ms it went down to 0.8ms !!! doing
this is way faster than records I think...and since the fn I memoized
takes no args it can't be cached more than once yes?
Jim
ps: my second question can be considered reduntant...I meant to say
that some of the keys in the map point to function calls (they don't
return functions) so they can't be memoized...by the time the map is
returned everything inside is a value...
On 19/06/12 12:46, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
Ok we've established that accessing records fields is much faster
than using regular maps...what will happen though if we create a
memoized fn that simply returns the map? will records still be
faster? also if some of they keys in the map point to other functions
do they need to be memoized as well?
Jim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
