On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Sam Aaron <samaa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems that guarding the protocol declarations inside of a defonce does > the job nicely, although it is a big fugly. It's not too bad a trade-off > though, because we rarely, if ever, want to change a protocol definition > live. My main concern is that it wasn't obvious what was breaking Overtone > during reloads, and it took some real trial and error discovery to figure > that it was the protocol declarations. Perhaps Phil is right, and they're > not the best choice for the job - perhaps multimethods might be a better > fit for our needs. > > I think that at least the documentation could be improved to warn people > that defprotocol and namespace reloading don't play well together. This > thread will already act as a start in this area :-) > > David, it's cool that ClojureScript doesn't suffer from this issue though! > > Sam > > --- > http://sam.aaron.name Looking forward to an Overtone API over WebAudio ( http://chromium.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/samples/audio/index.html) :) David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
