On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Phil Hagelberg <p...@hagelb.org> wrote:
> Protocols necessarily make some unfortunate dynamicity trade-offs in the > name of self-hosting. If you value interactive development over execution > efficiency perhaps they are not the right choice. > > -Phil > Depending on what Clojure implementation you are using of course. ClojureScript doesn't have this problem ;) Given my understanding of how protocols are currently implemented on Clojure JVM (partially backed by very static Java interfaces), I don't think you can achieve what you want. Perhaps JVM invokedynamic can help one day? David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
