> > This still requires changing your code to @(:emails contact). If you use >>> (emails contact) you need change your code in only one place. >>> >> The name "emails" implies that it's a sequence. Lazy sequence.
> Property is just the OO word for function, semantically they are the same. > OO doesn't have functions they have properties and methods. > I thought the concept similar to function in OO-world is "method". Ok, so if property is a function, then you want to get rid of data structures at all and have only functions? Agreed, clojure has a much stronger emphasis on immutability than > traditional OO programming and is what I like about it... but it is > possible to write OO code using immutable data structures but is not as > idiomatic. > Well, it's kind of idiomatic in scala, for example. But not in clojure, yes. > I don't want clojure to be like CLOS, but I also don't think that we > should ignore more than 50 years of lessons learned and "SOLID" programming > principles. > SOLID is about object-oriented design. 50 years of lessons learned tell us that objects have failed :) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
