>> While I agree that one could use a record in place of a struct, I >> don't think structs are "obsolete", at least not officially. >> > > From http://clojure.org/datatypes: > >>> Overall, records will be better than structmaps for all >>> information-bearing purposes, and you should move such structmaps to >>> defrecord.
In that case, defstruct, etc. should bear the same warning in docstrings/metadata as well. Regards, BG -- Baishampayan Ghose b.ghose at gmail.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
