On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Evan Mezeske <emeze...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anything I could do with Clojure with an aesthetically different
> (but functionally identical ) set notation that I cannot do with Clojure
> right now?
Attract 0.7 more people per 1000 on average to adopt the language, perhaps. :)
> Anyway, no matter how beautiful a new set notation might be (not that I
> personally think {{}} is beautiful), it seems that having two notations for
> one concept would be more confusing than having one notation for one
> concept. You *know* that this question would appear on a regular basis,
> "What is the difference between #{} and {{}}?"
How often do we get "What are the differences among 100, 0144, and
0x64, and which should I use when?" ;)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
