On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:28 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Sean Corfield <seancorfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> (require '[clojure.core.logic :as ?]) >> >> (?/run [q] ;; instead of run* >> (?/cons 1 q (cons 1 [2 3]))) ;; instead of (conso 1 q (cons 1 [2 3])) > > That's a perfectly valid way to use core.logic and some people do.
Except that you have to remember it's run* and conso and resto and conde etc which was my real point. And why is it run* and not run? > People can divide up their core.logic code bases however they see fit. I > personally see no benefit in putting relations in a different namespace. Apparently some users of the library do see a benefit :) -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
