On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:21 PM, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > It has nothing to do w/ qualified or not qualified, namespaces or anything > else. In some programs you may want to freely mix functions and relations.
But that's what namespaces are for in Clojure, yes? Seems like this would be equally clean: (require '[clojure.core.logic :as ?]) (?/run [q] ;; instead of run* (?/cons 1 q (cons 1 [2 3]))) ;; instead of (conso 1 q (cons 1 [2 3])) -- Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
