Hi, well this depends on whether you keep the head of first group or not. Contrived example:
(let [s (lazy-partition-by ....)] [(first s) (next s)]) This would be a problem, since you keep the first group. With your version it would work as well as the underlying sequences are independent. Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
